{Disagree/Con.best}
I devastly recommend that Zoos should be banned from the world because many animals are abused or threatened by Zookeepers or people who catch the animals (Elephants in Thailand get whacked with sharp sticks to do stuff).
Even if Captivity can extend an animal's lifetime , it changes its behavior acting. Animals get undeniably lazy because they are positioned in a small mimicked area of their habitat , especially because they get feeded their own food and dont have to run for predators and last of all they never have to spurt from predators if in danger.
Obviously , today Zoos use smarter technology to catch wild animals but think of the old times , they used strong wire to wrap around the animals head. They to HURT the animal to put it in a Zoo. Today they use a knockout dart called tranquiliser. Think about it , it still hurts the animal in pain while being knocked out.
I agree because when their wild they can die easy that’s why they put them in the zoo because they get good food and they won't
Get extinct.
The animals keeper it’s good to the animals because it’s feed them but when
Visitor are mean to animals.
{agree/pro number 2.better}
I agree that zoos should exist.the reason that i agree is because so that the animals would not be extinct,they wouldn't be extinct because the zoo keepers would make them breed(meaning making babies). e.g. bald eagles have been going extinct but Zoos have saved some by breeding in captivity.
Zoos should exist because also they can make them live longer and enjoy their food.
\
By jeremy,fereti,keru.
